Stuart Stevens, lead strategist for Romney’s 2012 campaign, rightly disagrees with the idea that Mitt lost because of social media. His organizational haplessness (yes, he was supposed to be the guy who knew how things worked) didn’t help, but it was his awful 1980s doctrines from a brain-dead party that brought him down.
I’m not denying that in the slightest, but that’s only the introduction. Here’s the meat:
In this fourth decade of the Internet, one of the original truisms is still true: Content is king. The ugly, clunky Drudge Report site still harvests record numbers of eyeballs because it serves up a hearty meal at a good price: free. The content rule is true across mediums. How many graphic makeovers and relaunches has CNN attempted to arrest its slow slide? …
That’s Sullivan quoting Stevens. The emphasis after the colon is mine. This is Marketing 101, folks. How many times are you going to change your logo? Change your signature colors? Change your tagline? Change the way you talk about yourself in an effort to “rebrand for market share?”
If the content sucks, it doesn’t matter how slick the design. Never has. Never will. If the content is brilliant no one cares what it looks like. Those are just the facts.
But don’t believe me. Ask the Coca-Cola company how many times they’ve changed their logo.